Thorn in Conservative Wiltshire Councillorsโ€™ Side; The Munster Show Must Go On!

Sheez, I go away for five minutes and look what happens. Devizes Facebookland turns into the Ok Corral! Seems I must interrupt my lovely mountaineering holiday to broadcast an alternative viewpoint from what’s being said on a local Facebook groupโ€ฆagain!

This, providing the post remains, proves what we’ve been saying about the political bias of Devizes Issues. Ooh, handbags at dawn; forever bad loser, the Munster of Lavington got his knickers in a twist with the head of Wiltshire Council Ian Thorn, took to poisoning Facebook with another rant, which, against every self-made rule of an apparent unbiased local information group, was successfully shared onto it.

As if Facebook isn’t toxic enough already with national politics, it seems local Tories are inclined to slander their opposition parties like they’re Andy Burnham before he’s even put his toothbrush in the holder at number ten.

I get that Thorn isn’t flavour of the month, and even MP Brian Matthew wrote to him to express concerns over the booking system trial at our recycling centres. For my tuppence on this, I agree with concerns about the flytipping it could encourage. Though Ben Reed for Devizes North points out โ€œthis pilot phase will be used to better understand the habits and needs of residents and ensure the service is tailored to their needs. It’s important to say up front that this is not a permanent change at this stage; if the trial doesn’t bring benefits, then the booking system will be amended or scrapped.โ€

That’s not a โ€œu-turnโ€ as suggested by Devizes Conservatives on that same Devizes Issues Facebook group, a group clearly so governed by the Devizes Conservatives it may as well change its name to The Devizes Daily Mail. It’s a trial. You don’t u-turn a trial, you try it, and if it doesn’t work, you scrap it, just as Ben said.

But we’re not waffling about recycling centres, it’ll cost nought to book a slot, ergo it’s a post-lockdown niggling storm in a teacup; flytippers are pricks, and will do their dirty business booking slots or not.

No, we’re more concerned with airing dirty laundry in public and the Councilโ€™s time it wastes; W (Worrow) entered the chat. I might occasionally slobber it, but I don’t retype drivel. So, through the powers of screenshot, here’s the glorious package of allegations in full technicolor, as shared on the ominous Facebook group:


How did he get away with that utter baloney, on a group clearly stating no political misinformation, plus lifetime banning others who do similar?!

Could it possibly be, and this is purely speculation based on an assessment of frequently recurring incidents, that this vicious attack of hearsays, in which it must be noted the Munster himself uses the word โ€œperceivedโ€ to loophole the fact what he’s saying hasn’t yet been proved, has been allowed by admin of the group to stay, because it has been immaturely presented by a fellow Conservative still grumpy the Lib Dems democratically won control of Wiltshire Council?!

I don’t know. Sounds like the whimpering of a spoiled toddler to me, but you be the judge. Conservatives had their own way for generations here, their silver spoons plopped from their mouths, and it’s understandable they’re tetchy about change; bless their cotton socks. But we should be concerned about the fairness of using a popular local Facebook group to level allegations that, as of yet, are unfounded. The group’s own rules should have meant that this post was not suitable for publication.

Ben Reed criticised the admin of the group, Conservative Devizes Town Councillor Iain Wallis, for his usage of the group as a biassed political platform. In a submitted post to the group, Mr Reed stated this would โ€œprobablyโ€ be his โ€œlast post on this group, since in my view it has become a Conservative mouthpiece.โ€

Yeah, it’s not your choice to make there, Ben! You have to ask yourself, given all the evidence, if Ben’s post will ever make the final cut and if he’ll be a group member for much longer. So, for your perusal, shock factor, or amusement, here it is:


As for Munster’s allegation, despite how he might perpetually cry about it, assume that for now, it is only an allegation because it’s only an allegation.

I will not side with any political party, I will form my opinion based on wider sources. But should it be proved correct, and Thorn is doing a dirty deal, I would gladly stand side by side with Dominic Muns at the Black Dog Crossroads or any other location of his choice, declare he was right, maybe eat a hat, and agree something needs to be done about it.

For now, I’ve probably got more important things I should do. There’s better than treating local council level like it’s the Imperial Council of the Galactic Empire on
Coruscant. But, I guess this was always going to be a repercussion by some Conservatives when their majority befell to a democratic election.

โ€œIโ€™ve spent the last few weeks reflecting on the tone of our politics, and frankly Iโ€™m deeply troubled,โ€ Cllr Taylor Wright mused on the subject.

โ€œIt has become far too common for politicians to casually throw around allegations of corruption, back-room deals, โ€œbrown envelopesโ€ or other forms of dishonesty without producing a shred of evidence. Sometimes, those accusations are made directly. Sometimes theyโ€™re encouraged through innuendo. Sometimes theyโ€™re allowed to spread because too few people are willing to stand up and say, โ€˜No. Thatโ€™s not true.โ€™โ€

Taylor rightly added that it โ€œshould concern every one of us.โ€

In a heartfelt opinion, he stated that threats have been made against Cllr Ian Thornโ€™s home. โ€œAs someone in public office myself, there are times I genuinely wonder whether itโ€™s sensible to take my three-year-old son into town because of the hostility that now seems to surround politics. That should horrify us all.โ€

โ€œI have defended Cllr Ian Thorn because there has never been any evidence presented that he has acted corruptly or improperly. I will continue to do so. But my defence doesnโ€™t stop there.โ€

โ€œI extend exactly the same principle to every councillor serving Wiltshire Council, regardless of party. Unless there is credible evidence of wrongdoing, I will not stand by while colleagues have their reputations dragged through the mud by rumour, insinuation, or politically convenient fiction.โ€

Head of Devizes Guardians, Jonathan Hunter, has also spoken to us about the fiasco. “Local politics should bring communities together, not drive them apart,โ€ he said.

โ€œResidents rightly expect their elected representatives to debate issues, but always with courtesy, integrity, and respect. Healthy debate is an essential part of democracy. However, personal attacks, division, provocation, and inflammatory language help no one. Also, the promotion of personal attacks in any setting causes great harm.โ€

โ€œBehind every social media post and every public role is a person, with family, friends, neighbours, and colleagues. The way we speak to each other, and also about one another, has a real impact, not only on those directly involved but also on the tone of the communities we serve. This reported behaviour is not what Devizes is about.โ€

It’s a shame, councillors stepping on thin ice formed by other vengeful councillors. But we, as the general public, need to not be convinced by this verbal sparring, because if we back it, it will only normalise petty squabbling, and just like national politics our council will get a revolving door system where nothing practical gets done.


A Year into a Lib Dem Wiltshire Council; Chatting with Ben Reed

Itโ€™s a Friday, just polishing off a big boy breakfast at New Society. Got the window seat; I ponder how beautiful Devizes Market Place looks from up here, and how we often take it for granted. Thereโ€™s Ben Reed, Wiltshire Councillor for Devizes North, waving at me from below; heโ€™s coming up for carrot cake, and to chew the fat over the first year with the Liberal Democrats at the helm of Wiltshire Councilโ€ฆ. priorities; not till Iโ€™ve finished my sausages!

There was minimal bumps driving here, in comparison to how it has been. The Council are slowly playing catch up with our dilapidated roads, but potholes remains firm on my agenda, because while the main roads are getting TLC, it feels like Devizes is being left out. Despite a lesser public issue visibly, isnโ€™t the spiralling costs of social care more important than potholes, or are the two holistically connected, if these potholes drive us to insanity?! Ben? He starts talking pubs; Iโ€™ve made a friend!

Far from being something Ben has researched, โ€œbut,โ€ he started, โ€œI think thirteen pubs might be the most of any council division in Wiltshire. It’s nice to have places to stop when you’re out and about delivering and canvassing.โ€ For the record, it was relevant. I was praising the cafรฉ.

It also served as an introduction to Benโ€™s enthusiastic bearing on the area he manages, explaining its diversity he continued, โ€œthere’s quite a lot of social housing, retirement complexes, and all the businesses. So, quite a lot going on.โ€ 

It is through this enthusiasm Iโ€™ll acknowledge while the public are keen to pick easy targets, like potholes, thereโ€™s so many other duties to being a Councillor we rarely contemplate.  Ben told me he was due to meet an elderly lady straight after this who lives in Long Street and finds it difficult getting around town. โ€œI’m going to try and work out what her routes are,โ€ he said, โ€œand maybe look at whether there are things I can report on the My Wilts app.โ€ Pausing to consider pedestrians navigating our wobbly pavements might better take their chances on the dodgy roads, Iโ€™m determined to turn him to the subject of potholes! Is Devizes being left out?!

โ€œIt does feel a bit like that,โ€ Ben agreed. โ€œfrankly, it’s going to be a problem for a while because the backlog is huge.โ€ I will, later in our chat, praise Ben for his Councillor Facebook page, where, unlike others, thereโ€™s no negativity bashing the opposition, just feelgood posts, but sometimes fact is fact, the previous Conservative Wiltshire Council seriously neglected road repairs, leaving us in this state and passing the buck.

โ€œI’ll try to steer away from being too tribal,โ€ Ben affirmed, โ€œbecause I don’t think it’s very helpful, but as I understand it, there was quite a bow wave of funding in the last couple of years as the election approached. I don’t know whether there was a realisation that this was a problem, but if you go back further than that, and this isn’t this isn’t particularly a Wiltshire problem, going back to 2010, when the Conservative government first came in, local authority funding across the board was really slashed. And highways were one of the things that councils chose to take the money away from. So there was a period where we fell behind with those preventative jobs. And now we’re chasing our tails. It’s a never-ending problem, and when you get a winter like we’ve just had with so much rain and then that freezesโ€ฆ.โ€

As it being a national issue, Iโ€™ve seen better roads in other counties. Yet, we may believe Wiltshire hits the hotlist for the worst roads, probably because we use them regularly. But research suggests Derbyshire, Northamptonshire, Lincolnshire, and others, long before Wiltshire gets a mention.

I could scrutinise the previous Conservative-led Wiltshire Council until suppertime, and Iโ€™m pleased someone else now has a stab at it. But, councillors on the opposition and ex-councillors who lost their seats, are quick to raise issues visible to the public, like the pothole debacle, whereas they wouldโ€™ve avoided the subject when The Conservatives were in charge.

In considering the often unmentioned tasks, such as social care costs, exampling the Trowbridge car park fiasco, which I talked to Taylor Wright about, I worry thereโ€™s too much time taken up with political point scoring, and  the council is far more disputative and argumentative now that the Tories are on the back foot and Reform makes their impact, against all common sense. To summarise, Iโ€™m gonna ask Ben how a council is supposed to find solutions to important and pressing countywide problems, when they spend months bickering about a carpark!

 โ€œYeah,โ€ Ben nods, Iโ€™m onto something! โ€œI found probably the least enjoyable element so far has been those council meetings. It’s difficult to see some of the tactics as anything other than obstructive, unfortunately. The way funding is and the way policies get brought forward is the council officers look at our manifesto and make suggestions and then the administration says yes, or, can we tweak this, and quite often the things we end up doing are probably the things, to be completely honest, that the Conservatives would have done if they’d if they’d still been in power, and yet they end up opposing what often are, as far as I can see, the most the most sensible measures, and the carpark is a good example, I think.โ€

โ€œIt’s a strange situation,โ€ Ben justifies the carpark fiasco thus, โ€œhaving to provide free parking, and this covenant. But you’ll see this week, NCP, the big carpark developer, have gone into administration. So, if they’re not making money on carparks that they can actually charge people to park in, then you can see what a liability a carpark that we’re not allowed to charge for is. And it’s got to be rebuilt. And it’s going to cost us far more now than it would have been to incentivise the developer to knock it down and, you know, build something nice for Trowbridge.โ€

 I can play โ€œrealโ€ journalist, try to gauge Ben for marketable controversy by name-dropping troublesome local political busybodies, but he’s not taking the bait! I’m unconcerned, for that’s never my objective. New to politics, Ben was keen to express he’d never been the opposition, so doesnโ€™t know what it feels like. Though, he comes across as genuine, an earnest and honest guy, tucking into his carrot cake.

There’s a phrase, โ€˜a week is a long time in politics,โ€™ maybe it’s the opposite for local politics; it’s early days for this new Wiltshire Council and perhaps, optimistically, we need to be patient to see any fruition at base level.

The carpark was only an example, I was more after dirt on the bickering. Issues regarding waste, reducing the bin collections, and Reformโ€™s pathetic failed bid to end net zero were all hitting points for the opposition, that we discussed later in our chat. I suggested we need some education on how to reduce waste, not just waste being collected, to which he agreed.

Disappointed by the reaction from the opposition and that โ€œthe petition that’s running doesn’t really go into detail,โ€ Ben was keen to talk bins, and to defend the motion. โ€œYour black bin collections are being reduced from two weekly to three weekly,โ€ Ben said, but expressed, โ€œalongside that, a weekly food waste collection is being introduced. So if you look at a six week period, people will actually be getting more for their money. There will be more collections over the year, just different collections, and hopefully there should be a lot less in the residual waste when the food waste comes out.โ€ Besides, he pointed out, it’s a government requirement, โ€œwe have to we have to do it.โ€

For the opposition itโ€™s a soundbite, easy to highlight your waste collection wonโ€™t be as regular under the Lib Dems, ย but Ben explained, โ€œit’s just not true. One type of bin collection has been reduced, but you’ve got a new one which is a lot more frequent. Sadly, there is a bit of game playing.โ€

On the general bickering, โ€œI do find that very energy-sapping,โ€  Ben replied. โ€œI try and stay away from it as much as I can. I think for the Conservative group, it’s a real change for them. It’s a period of adjustment. They’ve been in charge of Wiltshire Council pretty much from the outset. And I think, well, I hope they’ll find a bit of a friendlier way of conducting themselves. Because opposition is about fair criticism, it’s about scrutiny. They’re perfectly entitled to raise complaints. The roads, you know, it’s difficult to see how we can be criticised too much on those at the moment. Up until last month, we were working on the old Conservative budget. We’ve allocated some additional capital spend for the next few years. Hopefully we can get away from kind of reactive maintenance.โ€

โ€œJanuary, there were 2,700 pothole repairs, which is a record month ever. It’s an unwanted record, but, I think up to mid-March, they did about 5,000. And there’s normally, I think about 15,000 done a year. That’s quite a lot ahead of schedule. They’ll be concentrating on repairs until June and then hopefully they’ll get to a place where they can look at preventative maintenance. Station Road is a case in point. It’s been due for a proper resurfacing, but you can’t do that while Northgate Street is still closed. So as soon as that’s open, I’ll be pushing for Station Road to have its resurfacing, and they’ll come to Northgate Street later.โ€

It makes me wonder, that they created a road repair taskforce, if the workers are allowed to think for themselves and bypass the red tape, because thatโ€™s what appears to delay the process. You download the app, report one pothole at a time in a road of thousands, which goes through evaluation processes, paperwork, venturing out to spray-paint a square around it, or pop a cone in there. Whereas a taskforce could deal with it immediately. Because I see a repaired stretch of road, and often thereโ€™s potholes centimetres after it! Are they restricted to deal with what it says on a piece of paperwork, and not permitted to think, โ€˜hey, we’ve got a bit of spare tarmac, we could just carry on a wee bit, and cover that trench too?!โ€™

โ€œI’m told that there is a bit of leeway for that,โ€ Ben stressed. โ€œPotholes get prioritised, a defect or a pothole gets categorised. So, if it’s in a particularly dangerous area, or of a particular size or depth, then it gets a P1, and it’s supposed to be repaired within 24 hours. If there’s a crew going around doing those, they probably will ignore some smaller ones and just get the ones on their list ticked off. So that’s probably why that arises. But I think in practice, if there’s a massive priority one pothole and then some quite big ones obviously visible nearby, they probably would repair those before they move on, I’d like to think. But it depends how busy they are and what they’ve got on their list for that day.โ€

I canโ€™t really argue with that, state of our roads, they must be busy bees!  Ben also suggested technical issues with the MyWilts app needs reviewing, that issues raised by the public can be marked as closed even if the issue hasnโ€™t been resolved. โ€œI don’t think they should be closed until they’re repaired,โ€ he said, โ€œwe’ll see what the review of the app comes up with, in terms of improvements.โ€

Itโ€™s not the roads though taking up the budget, annoying as it is to hit a pothole, the bigger picture is knowing vulnerable people are safely cared for. โ€œPeople often don’t realise that the bulk of our funding, whether that’s from government or from council tax payments, is pretty much spent before we even decide what to do with it. And social care takes up a really big chunk of that. So, children’s and adults, vulnerable people’s services is, I forget the exact percentage, but it’s certainly over 60% of all Wiltshire Council’s expenditure.โ€

โ€œThat’s an ever-increasing chunk,โ€ Ben justified, โ€œwhich makes it really difficult to find money for other statutory services, like library services are statutory, highways too, obviously. Once you get beyond that, you’re really having to find pennies to do things. Leisure, for instance, is not a statutory service, but Wiltshire’s managed to keep a reasonable number of leisure centres. I think, compared to some local authorities, we’ve done quite well there, building a new leisure centre in Trowbridge, which is coming on very well.โ€

โ€œBut yeah, social care is the headline thing, I think, for councils. And it’s very important to look after people who need help. I’m recently been added to the Children’s Select Committee, which is the main scrutiny committee for all the children’s services. They look at how schools are performing, school attendance, and the leisure and youth services we offer. I’m really enjoying that actually. I don’t have children, so I thought, well, maybe this isn’t the right committee for me. But no, of all the committees I’m on, I think I get most out of that. So yeah, it’s been good.โ€

We talked for some time on MPs, praising Brian Matthew, and we agreed switching parties, as Danny Kruger recently did in Marlborough should meet with a by-election. But the focus needed shifting back to council level, so I asked Ben what he thought the biggest changes at Wiltshire Council has been, and how transparent they are.

โ€œWe certainly want it to feel people are closer to their council,โ€ Ben responded. โ€œThey can ask questions and get answers, and then we will be, transparent with people. Yeah, there’s criticism been levelled about, some meetings go into part two, which is confidential business. And, like the carpark, we were accused of doing things behind closed doors. But this is completely standard stuff that happened under the last administration. If there’s commercial sensitive information, then it doesn’t, or personal; if individuals are being spoken about, that isn’t going to be in the public domain. And that’s the same everywhere.โ€

The opposition play on this, and it reflects badly?

โ€œWell, it does,โ€ Ben agreed. โ€œThere’s no reason why people shouldn’t take what they’re reading from them at face value. But to be honest, I wish more people would tune in to the council meetings on YouTube. Because to me, If you watch a bit of that, then it’s pretty clear, to me at least, who’s trying to get things done, and who’s trying to stop things moving forward.โ€

With public engagement, prior to the meeting, Ben stressed surgeries arenโ€™t popular. I said he shouldnโ€™t take it personally, as they often happen during the working day, and supposed many of us, myself guilty too, prefer to have a whinge on Facebook rather than address the councillors in person!

โ€œProbably, yeah,โ€ he figured.โ€ I want to make sure if someone does want to get in touch with me, they can. So the more channels and opportunities there are for that, the better. And that’s partly on me to go out to events and knock on people’s doors and sort my focused newsletters out three or four times a year. But, it does need someone to make the effort to drop me a line. It can be a phone call, an e-mail, a Facebook message. They can come and see me at a surgery. I am trying to do the surgeries evenings or weekends, so hopefully a bit friendlier times for people.โ€

โ€œI’ll answer comments on Facebook if I think I sensibly can. Sometimes people make comments, and you can understand why, people let off steam, but maybe they donโ€™t know the full facts of what the issue is. And sometimes it’s complex to explain that. So it’s difficult on a Facebook message.โ€

And people can take it the wrong way. It’s just words. Herein I raised the Kebab Shop fire as an example, an issue Ben confirmed had been his most pressing, and being such a complex one, has learned not to  โ€œover promise.โ€ He originally said the site will be demolished in February, weโ€™re moving into April. Devizes is a lovely place, but it’s easy to think the town’s in a state, and everything that’s promised is just pie in the sky.

โ€œWhat would be a worry for a town is if there wasn’t these developments happening,โ€ Ben replied, โ€œif it wasn’t a place where developers wanted to invest and create new facilities and new homes.โ€

โ€œDevizes, seems to be moving in the right direction, and I know it’s frustrating with the delays, but I think there’s so much light at the end of the tunnel. Northgate Street, the kebab house, there’s been a perfect storm, but itโ€™s really unfortunate in terms of the location, the type of building and the damage that was done, ended up being propped up like it was.โ€

โ€œQuite apart from the human aspect of it and the loss of business and livelihoods, and the neighbouring properties are both quite badly damaged as well. Hopefully they can get on and get it repaired. And it has dragged. If I’d been able to hire a wrecking ball and pitch up there myself, I would have done it!โ€

โ€œIt was not the easiest thing to inherit. It was six months after the fire that I won the election, and at that stage, I don’t think the owner had worked through all the insurance issues. But eventually the demolition application went in. They were supposed to do it in February, as you say. They hadn’t finalised the partition wall agreement, because they need to make sure when they knock it down that they don’t do more damage to number one and number three. And then the contractor wasn’t available until April. So we are where we are.โ€

Our chat continued onto Station Roadโ€™s resurface and its traffic flow. Ben agreed lessons needed learning between the Highway’s team and Building control team, and he raised other issues, such as the condemned old Royal Oak building.

โ€œThey’re converting it into apartments,โ€ he said. โ€œIt was a terrible state, but it’s a listed building, so it’s really good to see it getting back into use. Unfortunately, they’re going to need to close half of New Park Street to sort out the water and electricity connections. So, I’ve been talking with the traffic team at Wiltshire Council, about when is a good time; there’s no good time! I think the offer they’ve made to the developer is do it overnight, so there won’t be any closures in the day. So, we’re waiting for that to be scheduled.โ€

โ€œItโ€™s only a short closure, but what we don’t want is any overlap with Northgate Street still being closed. So, the highways team are always balancing these things against each other.โ€

It was great to meet and chat with Ben, for thereโ€™s many issues which need clarification. Short newspaper articles on a relative single subject cannot provide as much information, and being surgeries arenโ€™t popular and the public tend to need matchsticks to keep their eyes open watching a video of council meetings, it is all too easy to be misinformed about Wiltshire Council! I believe social media posts from the opposition parties should be taken with a pinch of salt, and while criticism is fair game, things are looking positive a year into the newly elected Lib Dem council.


Trending….

Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.